Dating Auditors:
A buyer guide for adult AI companions.
Dating Auditors helps adults choose hosted AI companions by comparing public policies, observable product behavior, pricing, access, and limitations. The site is commercially funded through affiliate links. That does not authorize invented tests, unpublished scores, or jailbreak recipes.
We do not run a laboratory of models, encryption proofs, or bot-farm detectors. Material claims on the site are labeled as operator-stated, observed, third-party reported, editorial inference, or unknown.
What We Do
We publish EN and RU decision pages for adult chat, privacy, payments, mobile access, images, and voice. A partner can be the default recommendation when the user job and the public documents support it. One product should not win every intent.
How pages are built
This matches the site FAQ. We do not invent lab tests, context-window scores, or unpublished filter trials. Site FAQ.
Adult policy, not a bypass
If a product sells adult roleplay in writing, we say so. If Character.AI or Replika forbid pornographic user content, we report that status. We do not publish prompt workarounds.
Privacy from public documents
Retention, deletion, training use, trackers, and calls come from operator policies and help pages, dated on the article. Marketing “E2EE” or “zero log” copy does not override the legal page.
Job fit and access
Text vs stills vs voice, website vs store app, and what a plan actually lists. We do not score latency, anatomy, or “integrity indexes.”
Editorial independence
Commercial funding is disclosed. Rankings are not for sale.
- • Affiliate links (Candy AI, CrushOn, DreamGF, Muah AI) may earn a commission. Limitations stay on the page either way.
- • We do not sell paid reviews or guaranteed placements.
- • We do not operate our own AI companion products, and we do not sell user data.
Read the live operator page before you pay. Contact us if a sourced fact on the site is wrong.
Lead researcher
Elizabeth Blackwell
AI Compliance Researcher @ Dating Auditors
Elizabeth Blackwell is the established editorial byline for Dating Auditors. She is responsible for the buyer-guide pages: comparing what operators publish with what the product actually sells, and labeling what remains unknown.
There is no Platform Integrity Index™, no unpublished scoring system, and no claimed verification of chat E2EE or dating-app bot farms on this site. Those older About claims are withdrawn. Product pages now follow dated public documents.
What the byline is accountable for
Editorial work on Dating Auditors, not a private lab stack:
Operator documents
Policies, help centers, pricing, and store listings — with dates. Marketing pages are weaker than legal pages when they conflict.
Evidence labels
Operator-stated, observed, third-party reported, editorial inference, or unknown. Exact scores need correspondingly strong evidence.
Job split
Hosted adult text, character catalogs, stills, and voice are different purchases. A partner can lose a column.
Corrections
When a policy changes or an older claim cannot be sourced, the page is rewritten in place. We do not keep a fake 30-day retest calendar.
GitHub
A public GitHub profile is part of this byline. Two repositories are listed there (dating-integrity-analyzer, dating-privacy-auditor). As of 31 August 2026 they are public stubs, not a reviewed, published audit-script suite. Product claims on Dating Auditors must stand on the article, not on those repos.
🔗 Elizabeth Blackwell on GitHubThis profile is an editorial identity for Dating Auditors. It is not a law firm, a penetration-test lab, or a dating-app fraud unit. Content is 18+. Affiliate relationships are disclosed on commercial pages.
Contact
Dating Auditors
Adult AI companion buyer guide (EN/RU)
📧 Email: [email protected]